As previously mentioned, I’m a bit dissatisfied with the current crop of Mayoral candidates. That said, I’m willing to hear what they
have to say, and will inevitably vote for one who loses in the run-off (looking
at you, Arroyo) before being forced to choose between a corporate shill and a
union hack.
But okay, currently there are a lot of candidates. I wasn’t
excited to have to wade through all of their platforms, but luckily on the
issue of late-night transportation, they’ve
saved me the trouble by all having virtually the same position![i]
And what’s that position? According to a Boston.com “Meet
the Mayoral Candidates” piece, it’s that Boston should be open later.
![]() | ||
| City Councillor John Connolly. Get used to this face. He's probably your next mayor. |
Both Felix Arroyo and John Connolly manage to use the term
“24/7,” while Bill Walczak suggests we become a “24-hour city.” Mike Ross, John Barros, and Walczak all hoped for “late-night” service, while Charlotte
Golar-Richie couched her position by saying she’d “strongly encourage the MBTA
to make improvements to the system.” That’s lovely, candidates. Very
innovative. But what are you actually planning to do?
As far as tangible ideas and proposals, John Barros came out swinging. He mentioned working with the Governor (which, to fix the T, you’d
need to do) to get system the funding it needs, and proposed a student discount
pass for university students, which is a really good idea given how expensive
being a student in Boston is.
